Outcomes of Casualties Without Airway Trauma Undergoing Prehospital Airway Interventions: A Department of Defense Trauma Registry Study

Author:

Schauer Steven G123,Naylor Jason F4,Maddry Joseph K23,Kobylarz Fred C56,April Michael D3

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78212

2. 59th Medical Wing, JBSA Lackland, TX 78236

3. Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234

4. Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 98431

5. Army Medical Department Center and School, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234

6. Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Most airway obstruction occurs secondary to traumatic disruptions of the airway anatomical structures. However, casualties may require airway interventions for other indications (e.g., depressed mental status). We describe casualties undergoing airway intervention in the prehospital, combat setting without apparent upper airway trauma. Materials and Methods We used a series of emergency department procedure codes to identify patients within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) from January 2007 to August 2016. This is a subgroup analysis of those patients with a documented prehospital airway intervention and no apparent airway trauma as defined by abbreviated injury scale of 0 for body regions 1 (head/neck) and 2 (face). Results Our predefined search codes captured 28222 DODTR subjects of whom 409 (1.4%) met criteria for study inclusion. Subjects included members of host nation forces (34%) and civilians (30%). Most subjects sustained injuries in Afghanistan (82%). Explosive (57%) and gunshot wounds (36%) were the most frequent mechanisms of injury. Median injury severity scores were 17. The most common anatomical locations of injuries for included subjects included extremities (53%) and thorax (29%). A majority of subjects underwent intubation (89%); comparatively few casualties underwent placement of a nasopharyngeal airway (2%) or supraglottic airway (2%). The proportion of subjects surviving to hospital discharge was 80% and was highest among subjects undergoing intubation (82%). Conclusions In this subgroup analysis of casualties without apparent upper airway trauma, survival rates were lower when compared to our previous report. Higher quality data are necessary to better understand the resuscitation needs of this critically ill subset of combat casualties.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care;Eastridge;J Trauma,2011

2. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care;Eastridge;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012

3. Registry of emergency airways arriving at combat hospitals;Adams;J Trauma,2008

4. Advanced airway management in combat casualties by medics at the point of injury: a sub-group analysis of the reach study;Mabry;J Spec Oper Med,2011

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3