Affiliation:
1. Department of War Wound Rescue Skills Training, Base of Army Health Service Training, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
2. Unit 77115 of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Chengdu, Sichuan 611235, China
3. Department of Emergency, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
For combatants without systematic medical education experience (CSMEE), it is necessary to participate in first-aid on the battlefield, but currently there is no effective training curriculum for CSMEE in Chinese military.
Materials and Methods
A list of first-aid techniques based on expert consensus was formed, and then a curriculum was established according to the list. The effectiveness of the curriculum was further evaluated by comparing the scores among group A (the reserve officers trained by this curriculum), group B (the reserve officers in the military medical college trained by professional medic training system), and group C (the fresh officers trained by the Outline of Military Training and Assessment of Chinese military), through a 5-station assessment in a simulated battlefield environment, which included the following 5 techniques: tourniquet for massive extremities hemorrhage, thyrocricocentesis, thoracentesis, fixation of long bone fractures, and wound dressing with hemostatic bandage.
Results
The training curriculum entitled “Implementation and Assessment Standards of First-aid Training for Combatants on the Battlefield” was established. The comparison of average scores in the 5-station assessment showed that group A had better scores than group C in tourniquet for massive extremity hemorrhage, thyrocricocentesis, and thoracentesis, with no significant differences compared with group B. Also, no significant difference between groups A and B in overall completion time and overall scores was observed, whereas an excellent candidate rate in overall score of group B was better than that of group A (87.4% vs. 80.9%, χ2 = 4.40, p = 0.036), and group A was better than group C (80.9% vs. 37.5%, χ2 = 62.01, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The established training curriculum is indeed effective, which improved the CSMEE’s first-aid capacity on the battlefield, and is equivalent to the level of medics.
Funder
People's Liberation Army of China
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献