Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2. Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System , Iowa City, IA 52246, USA
3. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
4. Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Physical inactivity, hereafter inactivity, is a serious health problem among U.S. veterans, hereafter veterans. Inactive adults are at risk for adverse cardiac events and premature mortality. Specifically, among veterans, inactivity has been associated with a 23% increase in mortality. In order to increase physical activity among veterans, we developed Veterans Affairs (VA) MapTrek, a mobile-phone-based web app that allows users to take a virtual walk in interesting locations around the world while tracking their progress against that of others like themselves on an interactive map. Steps are counted by a commercially available Fitbit triaxial accelerometer, and users see their progress along a predefined scenic path overlaid on Google Maps. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of VA MapTrek to increase physical activity in a population of veterans at risk for obesity-related morbidity.
Materials and Methods
We recruited overweight and obese veterans obtaining care at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Center. Half of the veterans were assigned to participate in VA MapTrek. Each week, participants were assigned virtual walking races (Monday through Saturday), which followed a predetermined route that is displayed on Google Maps. The participant’s position on the map is automatically updated each time their Fitbit syncs to their phone. In addition, challenges were issued periodically. Veterans in the control group were only given a Fitbit. We regressed daily step counts on the days of the week, the days since the start of the intervention period, whether the user was in the VA MapTrek or Control group, and an interaction between the study group and the days since the start of the intervention period. We included subject-specific random intercepts and subject-specific random slopes. This model was estimated using Bayesian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo using Stan’s No-U-Turns sampler. We set vague, uniform priors on all the parameters.
Results
We enrolled 276 participants, but only 251 (102 in the control group and 149 in the VA MapTrek group) contributed data during the intervention period. Our analysis suggests an 86.8% likelihood that the VA MapTrek intervention led to a minimum increase of 1,000 daily steps over the 8-week period, compared to the control group. Throughout the 8-week intervention, we project that VA MapTrek participants would have taken an extra 96,627 steps, equivalent to 77.8 additional kilometers (km) (48.3 additional miles), assuming an average of 1,242 steps per km (2,000 steps per mile).
Conclusions
Our study underscores the potential of VA MapTrek as an intervention for promoting walking among veterans who face elevated risks of obesity and cardiac issues. Rural veterans are a high-risk population, and new interventions like VA MapTrek are needed to improve veterans’ health.
Funder
Office of Rural Health
University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational Science
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)