Formal Methods for Establishing Simulation Interoperability for Military Health System Applications

Author:

Davis Nichole K1ORCID,Byrne Ryan2,Gupta Raj K3,Santago II Anthony2,Tolk Andreas4

Affiliation:

1. Mechanical and Reliability Engineering, The MITRE Corporation , Bedford, MA 01730, USA

2. Biotechnology & Life Sciences, The MITRE Corporation , McLean, VA 22102, USA

3. DoD Blast Injury Research Coordinating Office (BIRCO), Joint Trauma Analysis and Prevention of Injury in Combat (JTAPIC), US Army Medical Research and Development Command , Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA

4. Modeling & Analysis Innovation Center, The MITRE Corporation , Charlottesville, VA 22921, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Advancements in information technology have facilitated information exchange practices within the Military Health System (MHS), enabling “systems of systems” approaches that broaden and coordinate the set of capabilities available to enhance patient outcomes. This is applicable for MHS modeling and simulation (M&S) applications as well. Learning from successful approaches applied in current interoperability solutions used in the military helps to ensure interoperability practices yield trusted compositions of simulations. Materials and Methods The use of formal methods provides the rigor necessary to unambiguously communicate these approaches across the MHS community. Here, 3 formal methods are proposed to ensure the harmonization of models and alignment of M&S data needed for simulation interoperability for MHS applications. Results To clarify considerations relevant for establishing simulation interoperability, the proposed formal methods are examined within a notional example of an injury sustained because of blast exposure. The first method applies the principles of semiotics, addressing the coding of information via syntax and semantics, to understand how to align and transform data across simulations within a composition. The second method applies the concepts of well-specified co-simulations, and the use of different techniques, tools, and algorithms to address the composition and synchronization of M&S components. The third method applies the mathematical branch of model theory to codify expert knowledge about concepts, assumptions, and constraints to ensure conceptual alignment within the simulation composition. Conclusions Biomedical research must contend with complexity inherent to computational human body modeling, enlisting expert knowledge from multiple domains supporting the development of cross-disciplinary research tools that resolve research foci and associated differences in underlying theories, methods, and applied tools. This is closely related to the broader context of digital engineering for military systems engineering.

Funder

Medical Research and Materiel Command

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference34 articles.

1. Modeling and simulation technologies to enhance and optimize the Department of Defense’s medical readiness and response capabilities;Cohn;J Def Model Simul,2017

2. Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers;Tolk;Eur J Oper Res,2021

3. Credible practice of modelling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective;Erdemir;J Transl Med,2020

4. Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions;Post;Am J Math,1921

5. Semiotics, entropy, and interoperability of simulation systems—mathematical foundations of modeling and simulation standardization;Tolk,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3