Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences , Los Angeles, CA , USA
2. University of Southern California, Institute for Addiction Science , Los Angeles, CA , USA
3. University of Southern California, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism , Los Angeles, CA , USA
4. Tulane University, School of Social Work , New Orleans, LA , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Prior studies report nicotine/tobacco use disparities for sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth but have insufficiently characterized SGM identity diversity.
Aims and Methods
Adolescents (mean age = 15.2) from 11 high schools in Southern California completed surveys in Fall 2021. Ever use of combustible (cigarettes, cigars, hookah) and noncombustible (e-cigarettes, e-hookah, heated tobacco, smokeless/snus, oral nicotine) nicotine/tobacco (among overall sample, n = 3795) and susceptibility to future initiation of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and flavored non-tobacco oral nicotine (among n = 3331 tobacco-naïve youth) were compared across four gender (male/masculine, female/feminine, transgender male/female, non-binary) and seven sexual (heterosexual, bisexual, pansexual, queer, questioning, gay/lesbian, asexual) identities.
Results
Non-binary (vs. cisgender male) youth had greater prevalence of ever combustible (prevalence ratio [PR] = 2.86, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.76 to 4.66) and non-combustible (PR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.86) nicotine/tobacco use, and susceptibility to future nicotine/tobacco initiation (PR range = 2.32–2.68). Transgender (vs. cisgender male) youth had greater susceptibility to nicotine/tobacco use (PR range = 1.73–1.95), but not greater tobacco use prevalence. There was greater prevalence of non-combustible nicotine/tobacco use (PR range = 1.78–1.97) and susceptibility to nicotine/tobacco initiation (PR range = 1.36–2.18) for all sexual minority (vs. heterosexual) identities, except for asexual. Bisexual (PR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.30 to 3.16) and queer (PR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.31 to 6.27) youth had higher ever combustible tobacco use than heterosexual youth. Questioning (vs. heterosexual) youth were more susceptible to future tobacco initiation (PR range = 1.36–2.05) but did not differ in ever use.
Conclusions
Disparities in nicotine/tobacco use and susceptibility were present with similar effect sizes across most, but not all, SGM identities. Inclusive measurement of SGM identities in research and surveillance may inform more precise tobacco control efforts to reduce disparities.
Implications
Among high school students from Southern California with substantial diversity in sexual and gender identities, there was greater prevalence of tobacco use and susceptibility to future tobacco initiation for most, but not all, sexual and gender minority youth, including those with emerging sexual and gender identities such as non-binary, queer and pansexual. Additionally, findings indicate that tobacco control initiatives targeting youth who are questioning their sexual identities may be particularly important for preventing tobacco use initiation. This study reinforces the importance of measuring diversity within the LGBTQ + community for tobacco use research, and highlights how inclusive measurement can inform more precise tobacco control interventions.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Center for Tobacco Products
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference48 articles.
1. Youth tobacco use: population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study wave 3, 2015–2016;Johnson;Am J Prev Med.,2019
2. Associations between tobacco use patterns and demographic characteristics of sexual minority and heterosexual youth: results from a nationwide online survey;Hart;Tob Prev Cessat,2020
3. Sexual orientation disparities in adolescent cigarette smoking: intersections with race/ethnicity, gender, and age;Corliss;Am J Public Health.,2014
4. Tobacco product use and susceptibility to use among sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents;Garcia;Prev Med.,2021
5. Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students — national youth tobacco survey, United States, 2021;Gentzke;MMWR Surveill Summ.,2022