Ethical Challenges in Social Work Licensing Examinations: A Call for Integrity and Strategies for Success

Author:

Joseph Rigaud1

Affiliation:

1. University Parkway associate professor, School of Social Work, California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 , San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses four questions. First, what is the operational framework of the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB)? Second, how congruent is the ASWB’s operational framework with social work values and ethics? Third, why do ASWB exam candidates from disadvantaged backgrounds—those who identify as African American, who are older, and who do not speak English as a first language—register comparatively lower pass rates in the clinical licensure examination? Fourth, what are ethically sound novel strategies for improving the ASWB exam? This article argues that (1) ASWB, in its present state, operates under a business model philosophy, which is incongruent with the social work value of integrity, and (2) the disparities in pass rates in the ASWB exam may reflect its lack of validity. This article also presents three relatively innovative strategies for restoring confidence and increasing success in the ASWB social work licensing exam and two contingent solutions to the problem of exam pass rate disparities based on race, age, and primary language. The implications of this study for social work stakeholders are also discussed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference30 articles.

1. Test length and cognitive fatigue: An empirical examination of effects on performance and test-taker reactions;Ackerman;Journal of Experimental Psychology,2009

2. Cognitive fatigue during testing: An examination of trait, time-on-task, and strategy influences;Ackerman;Human Performance,2010

3. A test of the validity of the LCSW examination: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?;Albright;Social Work Research,2010

4. The great divide between social work educational policy and licensure examinations: Differing approaches to identifying competency that are challenging the profession;Apgar;Journal of Social Work Education,2021

5. The business model: Present and future—Beyond a skeumorph;Arend;Strategic Organization,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3