Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule Therapies in Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Author:

Shehab Mohammad12ORCID,Hassan Amro1,Alrashed Fatema3,Abbas Adnan4,Ma Christopher5ORCID,Narula Neeraj6ORCID,Jairath Vipul78ORCID,Singh Siddharth9,Bessissow Talat4

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mubarak Alkabeer University Hospital , Jabriya , Kuwait

2. Department of Translational Research, Dasman Institute , Kuwait City , Kuwait

3. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University , Jabriya , Kuwait

4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center , Montreal, QC , Canada

5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB , Canada

6. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University , Hamilton ON , Canada

7. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University , London, ON , Canada

8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University , London, ON , Canada

9. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been recently recognized as an important treatment target. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of different biologics and small molecule therapies in achieving better patient-reported outcomes and HRQoL in patients with UC. Methods We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception until February 1, 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission in the patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) score in UC patients who were treated with different biologics or small molecules during induction and maintenance phases. PRO-2 score is the sum of both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores. The secondary outcome was improvement of HRQoL defined as an increase in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score of ≥16 points from baseline or any change in total score from baseline. A random effects model was used, and outcomes were reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Interventions were ranked per the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) score. Results A total of 54 studies were included in the primary outcome analysis and 15 studies were included in the secondary outcome analysis. The primary analysis showed that during the induction phase all of included drugs were better than placebo in improving the PRO-2 score. Interestingly, upadacitinib was found to be superior to most medications in improving PRO-2 scores. The secondary analysis showed that guselkumab ranked first in the improvement of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, followed by upadacitinib during the induction phase. Conclusion Upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during the induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, mirikizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL in UC, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3