Performance of the 2023 Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis in Relation to the Modified Duke Criteria and to Clinical Management—Reanalysis of Retrospective Bacteremia Cohorts

Author:

Lindberg Helena12,Berge Andreas34,Jovanovic-Stjernqvist Martin2,Hagstrand Aldman Malin25,Krus David25,Öberg Jonas26,Kahn Fredrik25,Bläckberg Anna25,Sunnerhagen Torgny27,Rasmussen Magnus25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Halland , Halmstad , Sweden

2. Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University , Lund , Sweden

3. Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden

4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital   Stockholm , Sweden

5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital   Lund , Sweden

6. Department of Infectious Diseases, Helsingborg Hospital , Helsingborg , Sweden

7. Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control, Region Skåne Office for Medical Services , Lund , Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background Revised diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis (IE), the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria, were recently presented and need validation. Here, we compare the 2000 modified Duke criteria for IE with Duke-ISCVID among patients with bacteremia and relate the diagnostic classification to IE treatment. Methods We reanalyzed patient cohorts with Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, non–β-hemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus-like bacteria, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, and HACEK (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella) bacteremia. Episodes were classified as definite, possible, or rejected IE with the modified Duke and Duke-ISCVID criteria. Reclassification included the microbiology criteria, positron emission tomography–computed tomography, and cardiac implanted electronic devices. To calculate sensitivity, patients treated for IE were considered as having IE. Results In 4050 episodes of bacteremia, the modified Duke criteria assigned 307 episodes (7.6%) as definite IE, 1190 (29%) as possible IE, and 2553 (63%) as rejected IE. Using the Duke-ISCVID criteria, 13 episodes (0.3%) were reclassified from possible to definite IE, and 475 episodes (12%) were reclassified from rejected to possible IE. With the modified Duke criteria, 79 episodes that were treated as IE were classified as possible IE, and 11 of these episodes were reclassified to definite IE with Duke-ISCVID. Applying the decision to treat for IE as a reference standard, the sensitivity of the Duke-ISCVID criteria was 80%. None of the 475 episodes reclassified to possible IE were treated as IE. Conclusions The Duke-ISCVID criteria reclassified a small proportion of episodes to definite IE at the expense of more episodes of possible IE. Future criteria should minimize the possible IE group while keeping or improving sensitivity.

Funder

Region Halland Research Council

Foundation of Sparbanken Varberg

Swedish Government Funds for Clinical Research

Skåne University Hospital

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3