Affiliation:
1. Nova Southeastern University , Fort Lauderdale, Florida , USA
Abstract
AbstractDepending on our mode of reasoning—moral, prudential, instrumental, empirical, dialectical, and so on—we may come to vastly different conclusions on the nature of death and the appropriate orientation toward matters such as euthanasia or procuring organs from brain-dead patients. These differing orientations have resulted in some of the most enduring conflicts in biomedical decision-making with roots in the earliest strands of philosophical discourse. Through continually grappling with questions over matters of death, we continually step closer to clarity, even if certainty on these matters remains necessarily as elusive as death itself.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference19 articles.
1. A definition of irreversible coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death;Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death.;Journal of the American Medical Association,1968
2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
3. One hundred cases of suicide: Clinical aspects;Barraclough;British Journal of Psychiatry,1974
4. Americans’ strong support for euthanasia persists;Brenan;Gallup,2018
5. Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression;Carhart-Harris;New England Journal of Medicine,2021
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Public Bioethics Amidst a Pluralist People: A Project of Presumption, Despair, or Hope?;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-07-11
2. Foundations of Christian Bioethics: Metaphysical, Conceptual, and Biblical;Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality;2023-03-01
3. Philosophy of Cancer Theranostics;Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals;2023-02-01