Ideology, political polarisation and agility of policy responses: was weak executive federalism a curse or a blessing for COVID-19 management in the USA?

Author:

Gasulla Óscar1,Bel Germà2ORCID,Mazaira-Font Ferran A2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bellvitge University Hospital, Universitat de Barcelona , Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona , Spain

2. Department of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics (Public Policy Unit), Universitat de Barcelona , John Keynes 1-11, 08034 Barcelona , Spain

Abstract

Abstract We investigate whether weak executive federalism was beneficial or damaging for COVID-19 management in the USA. We formulate a policy response model for subnational governments, considering the national government’s preferred policy, in addition to other factors, with incomplete and with complete information. The hypotheses derived are tested using econometric techniques. Our results suggest that ideological and political biases were more influential in a situation of incomplete information than in one of complete information. As such, weak executive federalism allowed more agile policy responses in Democrat-led states when information was incomplete, thus reducing the rates of incidence and mortality. When information was complete, ideological and political biases were found to be of no relevance at all.

Funder

Generalitat de Catalunya

Agencia Estatal de Investigación

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference61 articles.

1. Predictive Model and Risk Factors for Case Fatality of COVID-19;Álvarez-Mon;Journal of Personalized Medicine,2021

2. Why pandemic response is unique: powerful experts and hands-off political leaders;Baekkeskov;Disaster Prevention and Management,2014

3. Resilient managed competition during pandemics: lessons from the Italian experience;Bel;Health Economics, Policy and Law,2022

4. The effect of health and economic costs on governments’ policy responses to COVID-19 crisis under incomplete information;Bel;Public Administration Review,2021

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3