Availability of virtual-assisted lung mapping affects procedure selection for early-stage lung cancer: a web-based cross-sectional study

Author:

Yamaguchi Hirokazu1ORCID,Sato Masaaki1,Yamamoto Kazumichi1234,Shinohara Kiyomi23,Yanagiya Masahiro1,Hashisako Mizuho5,Wannous Muhammad6,Nakajima Jun1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan

2. Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University , Kyoto, Japan

3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University , Kyoto, Japan

4. Institute for Airway Disease , Takarazuka, Japan

5. Department of Faculty of Sociology, The Rikkyo University Graduate School , Tokyo, Japan

6. Department of Information Systems, Graduate School of Information Technology, Kobe Institute of Computing , Kobe, Japan

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES The availability of new techniques may affect surgeons’ procedure selection and thereby affect clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the availability of virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) on the selection of lung resection methods. METHODS Members of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgeons were invited to participate in a web-based survey. Participants were divided into those who had never used VAL-MAP (group 0), those who had used only VAL-MAP 1.0 (multiple dye marks on the pleural surface; group 1) and those who had used VAL-MAP 2.0 (multiple dye marks and intrabronchial microcoils for three-dimensional mapping; group 2). Participants were shown chest computed tomography images of 6 ground-glass opacity nodules and asked to choose surgical procedures to resect the nodules with sufficient resection margins greater than the lesion diameter or 2 cm. RESULTS There were 197 surgeons in group 0, 49 in group 1 and 26 in group 2. All groups showed a similar trend of avoiding wedge resection for deeply located nodules. However, group 1 showed a trend of disagreeing with the selection of wedge resection compared with group 0 as measured by a Likert scale (1–5) by −0.21 points (95% confidence interval, −0.41 to −0.008 points, P = 0.042). This tendency disappeared in group 2. CONCLUSIONS The availability of VAL-MAP 1.0 led to the selection of segmentectomy, while the availability of VAL-MAP 2.0 led to aggressive deep wedge resection.

Funder

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3