Sex-Based Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants

Author:

Ludmir Ethan B1ORCID,Fuller C David1,Moningi Shalini1,Mainwaring Walker2,Lin Timothy A12,Miller Austin B3,Jethanandani Amit14,Espinoza Andres F2,Verma Vivek5,Smith Benjamin D1,Smith Grace L1,VanderWalde Noam A6,Holliday Emma B1,Guadagnolo B Ashleigh1,Stinchcombe Thomas E7,Jagsi Reshma8,Gomez Daniel R19,Minsky Bruce D1,Rödel Claus10111213,Fokas Emmanouil10111213

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

3. The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX

4. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN

5. Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

6. West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Memphis, TN

7. Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

8. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

9. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

10. University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

11. German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

12. German Cancer Consortium, Frankfurt, Germany

13. Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Landmark investigation two decades ago demonstrated sex-based disparities among participants in cancer cooperative group trials. Although federal efforts have aimed to improve representation of female patients in government-sponsored research, less is known about sex disparities in the broader landscape of modern oncologic randomized controlled trials. Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified randomized controlled trials related to colorectal or lung cancer (the two most common non-sex-specific disease sites). Among the 147 included trials, the proportion of female patients enrolled on trial was on average 6.8% (95% confidence interval = −8.8% to –4.9%) less than the proportion of female patients in the population by disease site (P < .001). Whereas no statistically significant underrepresentation of women was noted within the 26 cooperative group trials, sex disparities were markedly heightened for the 121 noncooperative-group-sponsored trials. Furthermore, underrepresentation of women did not improve with time. Future efforts should therefore focus on addressing these pervasive sex-based enrollment disparities beyond cooperative group trials alone.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3