Sensory acceptability of biofortified foods and food products: a systematic review

Author:

Huey Samantha L123ORCID,Bhargava Arini1ORCID,Friesen Valerie M4ORCID,Konieczynski Elsa M1ORCID,Krisher Jesse T1ORCID,Mbuya Mduduzi N N5ORCID,Mehta Neel H1ORCID,Monterrosa Eva4ORCID,Nyangaresi Annette M6ORCID,Mehta Saurabh123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York, USA

2. Program in International Nutrition, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York, USA

3. Center for Precision Nutrition and Health, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York, USA

4. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition , Geneva, Switzerland

5. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition , Washington, DC, USA

6. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition , Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

Abstract Context It is important to understand the sensory acceptability of biofortified food products among target population groups if biofortification is to be realized as a sustainable strategy for mitigation of micronutrient deficiencies, able to be scaled up and applied through programs. Objective This systemic review aims to summarize and synthesize the sensory acceptability of conventionally bred iron-, zinc-, and provitamin A–biofortified food products. Data Sources MEDLINE (PubMed), AGRICOLA, AgEcon, CABI Abstracts (Web of Science), and organizational websites (eg, those of HarvestPlus and CGIAR and their partners) were searched for relevant articles. No access to any market research that may have been internally conducted for the commercial biofortified food products was available. Data Extraction This review identified articles measuring the sensory acceptability of conventionally bred biofortified food products. Extraction of the hedonic ratings of food products was performed. Data Analysis An “Acceptability Index %” was defined based on hedonic scoring to determine an overall rating, and used to categorize biofortified food products as “acceptable” (≥70%) or “not acceptable” (<70%). Additionally, this review narratively synthesized studies using methods other than hedonic scoring for assessing sensory acceptability. Conclusions Forty-nine studies assessed the acceptability of 10 biofortified crops among children and adults, in mostly rural, low-income settings across Africa, Latin America, and India; food products made from mineral and provitamin A–biofortified food products were generally acceptable. Compared with studies on provitamin–A biofortified food products, few studies (1 to 2 each) on mineral-enhanced crops such as rice, cowpeas, lentils, and wheat were found, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Similarly, few studies examined stored biofortified food products. Few commercial food products have so far been developed, although new varieties of crops are being continuously tested and released globally. Certain crop varieties were found to be acceptable while others were not, suggesting that particular varieties should be prioritized for scale-up. Determining sensory acceptability of biofortified food products is important for informing programmatic scale-up and implementation across diverse populations and settings.

Funder

German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development

Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Commercialisation of Biofortified Crops

Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

HarvestPlus

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3