Food insecurity screening procedures used in reproductive healthcare settings

Author:

Zinga Julia123ORCID,van der Pligt Paige456,Lindberg Rebecca45ORCID,Vasilevski Vidanka27ORCID,Lee Amelia34ORCID,McKay Fiona12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University are with the , Burwood, Victoria, Australia

2. Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University are with the , Burwood, Victoria, Australia

3. Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Women's Hospital are with the , Parkville, Victoria, Australia

4. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University are with the , Burwood, Victoria, Australia

5. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University are with the , Burwood, Victoria, Australia

6. Department of Nutrition, Western Health is with the , Footscray, Victoria, Australia

7. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University is with the , Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Context Food insecurity is an important determinant of health and should be identified by clinicians during routine reproductive healthcare. The procedures used in reproductive healthcare settings to identify people experiencing food insecurity have not been fully researched. Objective The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence from published studies that describe the procedures implemented by clinicians in healthcare settings to identify food insecurity in pregnant women, or women of reproductive age (15 years–49 years). Data Sources Four databases were searched in April 2022 to identify studies that met the eligibility criteria. Data Extraction Studies that used tools that were both validated or newly developed were considered, as were studies that incorporated food insecurity screening as part of a multidomain screening tool. Two authors completed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. Data Analysis There were 1075 studies identified; after screening, 7 studies were included in the narrative synthesis, including studies relating to women who were pregnant or in the postpartum period; none of the included studies related to women in the preconception stage. Four screening tools were identified: 2- and 6-item tools specifically focused on food insecurity, a 58-item multidomain tool incorporating 4 food insecurity items, and a modified version of the 2-item tool. Methods of implementing screening varied across studies. Three described subsequent processes that supported food-insecure patients once identified. Conclusion Few published studies have investigated optimal screening tools and their implementation within reproductive healthcare settings to address food insecurity for this priority population group. Further research is required to determine: the optimal tool, preferable screening methods from the perspectives of both patients and clinicians, and potential strategies for implementation in countries outside of the United States. An additional evidence gap remains about referral pathways and appropriate supports for this population once food insecurity is identified. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022319687.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3