Affiliation:
1. University of Copenhagen
Abstract
Abstract
As international relations has started to grapple with its geo-cultural parochialism, the focus has been on its “Western-centrism” and on how “non-Western” international relations might be different. This article argues that attempts to deprovincialize “Western” (i.e., Euro-American) international thought do not always revolve around “non-Westernness,” a negation with often cultural-civilizational connotations, but also deploy a North/South worlding that is more bound up with imperial-colonial experience and a “peripheral” concern with economic insertion into the core. Based on interviews with scholars, diplomats, and foreign policy intellectuals in Brazil, the paper explores the different ways “the South” is deployed—as (post)colonial subjectivity, as problematique, as relation, as outside, and as political move—to provide an alternative intervention into the debate on “Global IR.”
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference100 articles.
1. Dialogue and Discovery;Acharya;Millennium,2011
2. Advancing Global IR;Acharya;International Studies Review,2016
3. Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory?;Acharya;International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,2007
4. Transforming World Politics
5. Never Before Seen in Brazil: Luis Inácio Lula Da Silva's Grand Diplomacy;de Almeida;Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional,2010
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献