The Hubble tension survey: A statistical analysis of the 2012–2022 measurements

Author:

Wang Bao12ORCID,López-Corredoira Martín345ORCID,Wei Jun-Jie12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Nanjing 210023 , China

2. School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei 230026 , China

3. Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias , E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife , Spain

4. PIFI-Visiting Scientist 2023 of China Academy of Sciences at Purple Mountain Observatory , Nanjing 210023 and National Astronomical Observatories, Beijing 100012 , China

5. Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna , E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife , Spain

Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to investigate the potential Hubble tension, we compile a catalogue of 216 measurements of the Hubble–Lemaître constant H0 between 2012 and 2022, which includes 109 model-independent measurements and 107 ΛCDM model-based measurements. Statistical analyses of these measurements show that the deviations of the results with respect to the average H0 are far larger than expected from their error bars if they follow a Gaussian distribution. We find that xσ deviation is indeed equivalent in a Gaussian distribution to xeqσ deviation in the frequency of values, where xeq = 0.72x0.88. Hence, a tension of 5σ, estimated between the Cepheid-calibrated type Ia supernovae and cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, is indeed a 3σ tension in equivalent terms of a Gaussian distribution of frequencies. However, this recalibration should be independent of the data whose tension we want to test. If we adopt the previous analysis of data of 1976–2019, the equivalent tension is reduced to 2.25σ. Covariance terms due to correlations of measurements do not significantly change the results. None the less, the separation of the data into two blocks with H0 < 71 and H0 ≥ 71 km s−1 Mpc−1 finds compatibility with a Gaussian distribution for each of them without removing any outlier. These statistical results indicate that the underestimation of error bars for H0 remain prevalent over the past decade, dominated by systematic errors in the methodologies of CMB and local distance ladder analyses.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3