Time evolution of X-ray bright points observed with NuSTAR

Author:

Paterson Sarah1ORCID,Hannah Iain G1ORCID,Grefenstette Brian W2ORCID,Hudson Hugh S13ORCID,Krucker Säm34,Glesener Lindsay5ORCID,White Stephen M6ORCID,Smith David M7

Affiliation:

1. School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Glasgow , University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ , UK

2. Cahill Center for Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology , 1216 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA

3. Space Sciences Laboratory University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720 , USA

4. University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland , CH-5210 Windisch , Switzerland

5. School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Minnesota Twin Cities , Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA

6. Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate , Kirtland AFB, NM 87123 , USA

7. Santa Cruz Institute of Particle Physics and Department of Physics, University of California , Santa Cruz, CA 95064 , USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present analysis on two X-ray bright points observed over several hours during the recent solar minimum (2020 February 21 and 2020 September 12–13) with the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), a sensitive hard X-ray imaging spectrometer. This is so far the most detailed study of bright points in hard X-rays, emission which can be used to search for faint hot and/or non-thermal sources. We investigate the bright points’ time evolution with NuSTAR, and in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-rays with Solar Dynamic Observatory/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (SDO/AIA) and Hinode/X-Ray Telescope. The variability in the X-ray and EUV time profiles is generally not well matched, with NuSTAR detecting spikes that do not appear in EUV. We find that, for the 2020 February bright point, the increased X-ray emission during these spikes is due to material heated to ∼ 4.2–4.4 MK (found from fitting the X-ray spectrum). The 2020 September bright point also shows spikes in the NuSTAR data with no corresponding EUV signature seen by SDO/AIA, though in this case, it was due to an increase in emission measure of material at ∼ 2.6 MK and not a significant temperature change. So, in both cases, the discrepancy is likely due to the different temperature sensitivity of the instruments, with the X-ray variability difficult to detect in EUV due to cooler ambient bright point emission dominating. No non-thermal emission is detected, so we determine upper limits finding that only a steep non-thermal component between 3 and 4 keV could provide the required heating whilst being consistent with a null detection in NuSTAR.

Funder

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Science and Technology Facilities Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3