Contemporary management of patients with syncope in clinical practice: an EHRA physician-based survey

Author:

Dan Gheorghe-Andrei1ORCID,Scherr Daniel2,Jubele Kristine3,Farkowski Michal M4,Iliodromitis Konstantinos5,Conte Giulio6,Jędrzejczyk-Patej Ewa7,Vitali-Serdoz Laura8,Potpara Tatjana S9

Affiliation:

1. Colentina University Hospital, University of Medicine ‘Carol Davila’, Cardiology Dpt, 37 Dionisie Lupu str, Bucharest, Romania

2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, Graz 8036, Austria

3. Arrhythmology Department, Paul Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia

4. II Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, Alpejska 42, Warsaw 04-628, Poland

5. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Electrophysiology Section, OLV Aalst, Belgium

6. Cardiology Department, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland

7. Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland

8. Heart and Lung Department, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany

9. School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia Visegradska 26, Belgrade 11000, Serbia

Abstract

Abstract Syncope is a heterogeneous syndrome encompassing a large spectrum of mechanisms and outcomes. The European Society of Cardiology published an update of the Syncope Guidelines in 2018. The aim of the present survey was to capture contemporary management of syncope and guideline implementation among European physicians. A 23-item questionnaire was presented to 2588 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) members from 32 European countries. The response rate was 48%, but only complete responses (n = 161) were included in this study. The questionnaire contained specific items regarding syncope facilities, diagnostic definitions, diagnostic tools, follow-up, and therapy. The survey revealed that many respondents did not have syncope units (88%) or dedicated management algorithms (44%) at their institutions, and 45% of the respondents reported syncope-related hospitalization rates >25%, whereas most (95%) employed close monitoring and hospitalization in syncope patients with structural heart disease. Carotid sinus massage, autonomic testing, and tilt-table testing were inconsistently used. Indications were heterogeneous for implanted loop recorders (79% considered them for recurrent syncope in high-risk patients) or electrophysiological studies (67% considered them in bifascicular block and inconclusive non-invasive testing). Non-pharmacological therapy was consistently considered by 68% of respondents; however, there was important variation regarding the choice of drug and device therapy. While revealing an increased awareness of syncope and good practice, our study identified important unmet needs regarding the optimal management of syncope and variable syncope guideline implementation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3