Investigating Respondent Attention to Experimental Text Lengths

Author:

Rettig Tobias1ORCID,Blom Annelies G23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Mannheim Project Coordinator of the German Internet Panel at the Research Data Center, Mannheim University Library, , Germany

2. University of Bremen Professor of Sociology at the , Germany and a member of the SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy

3. University of Bergen Honorary Professor at the Digital Social Science Core Facility (DIGSSCORE) at the , Norway

Abstract

Abstract Whether respondents pay adequate attention to a questionnaire has long been of concern to survey researchers. In this study, we measure respondents’ attention with an instruction manipulation check. We investigate which respondents read question texts of experimentally varied lengths and which become inattentive in a probability-based online panel of the German population. We find that respondent attention is closely linked to text length. Individual response speed is strongly correlated with respondent attention, but a fixed cutoff time is unsuitable as a standalone attention indicator. Differing levels of attention are also associated with respondents’ age, gender, education, panel experience, and the device used to complete the survey. Removal of inattentive respondents is thus likely to result in a biased remaining sample. Instead, questions should be curtailed to encourage respondents of different backgrounds and abilities to read them attentively and provide optimized answers.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference51 articles.

1. Attention by Design: Using Attention Checks to Detect Inattentive Respondents and Improve Data Quality;Abbey;Journal of Operations Management,2017

2. Answering Without Reading: IMCs and Strong Satisficing in Online Surveys;Anduiza;International Journal of Public Opinion Research,2016

3. A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check;Aronow;Political Analysis,2019

4. Seriousness Checks Are Useful to Improve Data Validity in Online Research;Aust;Behavior Research Methods,2013

5. AAPOR Report on Online Panels;Baker;Public Opinion Quarterly,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3