Gendered economic inequalities: a social policy perspective

Author:

Bennett Fran1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oxford Associate Fellow, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of , Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK

Abstract

Abstract This commentary addresses gender inequalities from a social policy perspective. It extends the analysis by Andrew et al. in this collection; focuses on lower incomes and social security; and recognizes both individual financial autonomy and interdependence as central. The commentary discusses labour market issues, including how to improve security and in-work progression for women in particular. Policy proposals are also made to limit the disruptions to women’s working lives by care for elderly or disabled people. More broadly, the commentary argues that a key question for any policy is whether it will help transform gender roles and relationships, to allow both sexes to fulfil their capabilities to the full. In addition, both male disadvantage and inequalities and economic dependence within households require more attention. Impact analysis should therefore explore not only distribution between households at the time but also potential effects on individual women and men over the life course. A balance is needed between moves towards economic independence and recognition of past, and continuing, inequalities. Policies can potentially tackle gender inequalities directly, and norms and values that may affect them indirectly. Proposals are put forward for changes in ‘family policy’, including towards second earners, parental leave and childcare. Finally, the commentary argues that the combination of a focus on autonomy and agency for all with awareness of our interdependence as a society and wider world means that gender issues must be central to the Deaton Review, not just for their own sake but also in a broader context.

Funder

Nuffield Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference84 articles.

1. Women and Men at Work—IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities;Andrew;Oxford Open Economics,2024

2. At the Edge of the Safety Net: Unsuccessful Benefits Claims at the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic;Baumberg Geiger;Salford: Welfare—at a Social Distance and Health Foundation,2020

3. Gender Implications of Current Social Security Reforms;Bennett;Fiscal Studies,2002

4. Researching Within-Household Distribution: Overview, Developments, Debates, and Methodological Challenges;Bennett;Journal of Marriage and Family,2013

5. The Developed World;Bennett;Megatrends and Social Security: Family and Gender, Geneva: International Social Security Association,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Gender, immigration, and ethnicity;Oxford Open Economics;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3