The Challenges of Implementing Special Sanctions (Sanciones Propias) in Colombia and Providing Retribution, Reparation, Participation and Reincorporation

Author:

Sandoval Clara1,Martínez-Carrillo Hobeth2,Cruz-Rodríguez Michael3

Affiliation:

1. School of Law and Human Rights Centre, and Director of Programmes at the Global Survivors Fund Professor at the

2. Researchers at the School of Law and Human Rights Centre, and Essex Transitional Justice Network Hobeth Martínez-Carrillo ( hm19404@essex.ac.uk ) Senior

3. Senior Researchers at the School of Law and Human Rights Centre, and Essex Transitional Justice Network Michael Cruz-Rodríguez ( mc19517@essex.ac.uk ) are

Abstract

Abstract The 2016 Final Peace Agreement between the Colombian State and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People’s Army (FARC) envisages an innovative approach to victims’ reparations from perpetrators including NSAG through special sanctions (sanciones propias). They are forms of lenient punishment consisting of effective restrictions of liberty to carry out works or activities, such as developing infrastructure, conditioned on the satisfaction of the rights of the victims, particularly reparation. This retributive and reparatory dimension of special sanctions is also linked to reincorporation of ex-combatants. While ambitious and creative, this approach is not immune from normative and practical implementation challenges that could jeopardize its effectiveness and potential. This article critically delves into eight challenges exploring key issues that are of theoretical and practical relevance for Colombia but also for the Transitional Justice field. It sheds light on potential solutions to these challenges but also notes how an incredibly complex system, like the Colombian one, faces major implementation challenges, something that other transitional justice experiences worldwide should learn as feasibility, without sacrificing victims’ rights, should be a key guiding principle of transitional justice efforts.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council—Global Challenge Research Fund

Legitimacy, Accountability, Victims’ Participation and Reparation in Transitional Justice Setting—Lessons from and For Colombia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference68 articles.

1. Rwanda's Gacaca CourtsBetween Retribution and Reparation

2. A Future where Punishment is Marginalized: Realistic or Utopian?;Braithwaite;UCLA Law Review,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3