Affiliation:
1. Washington State University, USA
2. International Monetary Fund, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Retroactive tax legislation is constitutional in most high-income countries. In this paper, we are concerned with the fiscal and macroeconomic consequences stemming from retroactive income taxation. Within the context of a real neoclassical economy, we find that if the government can set taxes retroactively within the fiscal year—or if there is a positive probability that a future government will be able to use retroactive taxation—then there exists a multiplicity of expectations-driven equilibria. In this case, neither fiscal policy nor macroeconomic aggregates are uniquely pinned down by economic fundamentals. Rather, they are determined by expectations about current and future fiscal policies. This implies that the government is a source of macroeconomic instability. In contrast, a constitutional reform banning the government from using retroactive tax legislation would yield a unique equilibrium, thus removing the possibility of expectations-driven fluctuations.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
European University Institute
International Monetary Fund
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference30 articles.
1. Expectation Traps and Monetary Policy;Albanesi;Review of Economic Studies,2003
2. Barriers to Investment in Polarized Societies;Azzimonti;American Economic Review,2011
3. The Politics of FDI Expropriation;Azzimonti;International Economic Review,2018
4. Distortionary Taxes and Public Investment when Government Promises Are Not Enforceable;Azzimonti;Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2009
5. Discretionary Policy and Multiple Equilibria in LQ RE Models;Blake;Review of Economic Studies,2012
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献