Understanding communication in community engagement for maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review

Author:

Dada Sara12ORCID,Aivalli Praveenkumar12ORCID,De Brún Aoife12ORCID,Barreix Maria3ORCID,Chelwa Nachela4,Mutunga Zaccheous5,Vwalika Bellington6ORCID,Gilmore Brynne12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

2. School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

3. UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization , Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland

4. Population Council , 8 Nyerere Rd., Lusaka, Zambia

5. Concern Worldwide , Westlands Ave, Nairobi, Kenya

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine , Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

Abstract As community engagement (CE) is implemented for sustainable maternal and newborn health (MNH) programming, it is important to determine how these approaches work. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have become a particular focus for MNH CE activities due to their high burden of maternal and neonatal deaths. MNH messaging and communication to engage communities are likely to differ by context, but how these approaches are actually developed and implemented within CE is not well understood. Understanding how communications in CE actually work is vital in the translation of learnings across programmes and to inform future projects. The purpose of this realist review is to describe how, why, to what extent and for whom communications in CE contribute to MNH programming in LMICs. After searching academic databases, grey literature and literature suggested by the expert advisory committee, documents were included if they described the CE communication processes/activities used for MNH programming in an LMIC. Relevant documents were assessed for richness (depth of insight) and rigor (trustworthiness and coherence of data/theories). Data were extracted as context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs) and synthesized into demi-regularities to contribute to theory refinement. After screening 416 records, 45 CMOCs were extracted from 11 documents. This informed five programme theories explaining that communications in CE for an MNH programme work when: communities are actively involved throughout the programme, the messaging and programme are acceptable, communication sources are trusted, the community has a reciprocal relationship with the programme and the community sees value in the programme. While these findings reflect what is often anecdotally known in CE or acknowledged in communications theory, they have implications for policy, practice and research by highlighting the importance of centring the community’s needs and priorities throughout the stages of developing and implementing communications for CE in MNH.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3