Author:
Cairney Paul,Keating Michael,Kippin Sean,Denny Emily St.
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter explores the scope for regional (or meso-level, sub-state) policymakers to redesign policy, and pursue differing priorities, within national systems of social welfare. Regional levels of government have increased powers to address inequalities, but their role is contested. There is no such thing as a typical division of responsibilities or one best way to address inequalities. Rather, we use examples from four countries—Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom—to explore how different regional-level governments make sense of inequalities policies. Examples include taxation and spending, social assistance, public service subsidies, minimum income guarantees, and charged, active labour market policies. From the available evidence, it would be an exaggeration to speak of distinct regional welfare regimes.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference622 articles.
1. Hard and soft law in international governance;International Organization,2003
2. Abels, G. (2011). ‘Gender equality policy’. In: Knodt, M. and Heinelt, H., eds. Policies within the EU multi-level system: Instruments and strategies of European governance, 325–348. (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
3. Informe sobre la política autonómia de servicios sociales en España y Catalunya;Revista de Educación Social,2007
4. Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems;Milbank Quarterly,2019