Author:
Wit Astrid De,Dickey Stephen M.
Abstract
Abstract
In this chapter we analyse the aspectual systems of English and Russian, and to a lesser extent Czech and Mandarin Chinese. We thereby discuss the theoretical and empirical shortcomings of exclusively temporal accounts of the aspectual constructions under consideration, and propose an epistemic alternative. This epistemic approach attaches central importance to the knowledge sets of the discourse participants, who may construe situations as fully and instantly identifiable, or—conversely—as contingent, and use aspectual devices as grounding devices to indicate this epistemic difference. We devote specific attention to differences between languages in terms of how the concepts of full and instant identifiability and contingency are morphologically and semantically realized. In doing so, we lay the foundation for a cross-linguistic typology that can serve as a backbone for the analysis of typologically diverse aspectual systems in epistemic rather than temporal terms.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference529 articles.
1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2018). ‘Evidentiality: the framework’, in Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1
2. Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard (2010). ‘The role of the imperfect in Romance counterfactuals’, in Martin Prinzhorn, Viola Schmitt, and Sarah Zobel (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14. Vienna: University of Vienna, 37–50.
3. Andersen, Roger W. (1991). ‘Developmental sequences: the emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition’, in Thom Huebner and Charles A. Ferguson (eds), Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 305–24.
4. Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions;Frontiers in Psychology,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献