An epistemic approach to aspectual systems

Author:

Wit Astrid De,Dickey Stephen M.

Abstract

Abstract In this chapter we analyse the aspectual systems of English and Russian, and to a lesser extent Czech and Mandarin Chinese. We thereby discuss the theoretical and empirical shortcomings of exclusively temporal accounts of the aspectual constructions under consideration, and propose an epistemic alternative. This epistemic approach attaches central importance to the knowledge sets of the discourse participants, who may construe situations as fully and instantly identifiable, or—conversely—as contingent, and use aspectual devices as grounding devices to indicate this epistemic difference. We devote specific attention to differences between languages in terms of how the concepts of full and instant identifiability and contingency are morphologically and semantically realized. In doing so, we lay the foundation for a cross-linguistic typology that can serve as a backbone for the analysis of typologically diverse aspectual systems in epistemic rather than temporal terms.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference529 articles.

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2018). ‘Evidentiality: the framework’, in Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1

2. Anand, Pranav, and Valentine Hacquard (2010). ‘The role of the imperfect in Romance counterfactuals’, in Martin Prinzhorn, Viola Schmitt, and Sarah Zobel (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14. Vienna: University of Vienna, 37–50.

3. Andersen, Roger W. (1991). ‘Developmental sequences: the emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition’, in Thom Huebner and Charles A. Ferguson (eds), Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 305–24.

4. Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions;Frontiers in Psychology,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3