Religious Fictionalism

Author:

Scott Michael

Abstract

Abstract Can one engage in the practices and language of a religion, gaining the moral, psychological, and social benefits of religious participation, without having religious beliefs? So argue religious fictionalists. This chapter focuses on revolutionary religious fictionalism and sets out ways of formulating and defending the position as well as the main challenges. Two difficulties for fictionalism are explored in detail: the problem of taking advantage of the participatory benefits of religion without some kind of deceit, and evidence of assertoric religious discourse where speakers are not committed to having religious beliefs, making revolutionary fictionalism redundant. These problems work in combination: the most promising contexts in which religious fictionalism can be advanced without raising worries about deceit tend to be those in which participation is already unencumbered by metaphysical commitments. The chapter concludes by considering the prospects of a restricted religious fictionalism, finding historical precedent in the apophatic and mystical tradition.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference41 articles.

1. Alston, W.  1996. “Belief, acceptance, and religious faith.” In J. Jordan & D. Howard-Snyder (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality. Rowman & Littlefield. 3–27.

2. Alston, W.  2005. “Religious language.” In W. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. 234–42.

3. Faith, belief and rationality.;Philosophical Perspectives,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3