Closing

Author:

Sherman Melina

Abstract

Abstract The book concludes by considering the implications of its findings for the development of drug policies and future research related to public health, medicine, and their relationship to culture. In addition to several practical suggestions related to the regulatory process, this chapter contends that developing a richer understanding of the opioid epidemic—of something that has often been understood and articulated as a purely medical phenomenon—would be better achieved by taking a more comprehensive approach that considers its relation to other social problems, to politics, and to American culture. Moreover, rethinking pain and addiction not as individual problems but as problems that can only be understood in complex, social, and cultural terms is a crucial agenda for future research. Examining how pain is defined, realized, and assessed; how people relate their own pain and the pain of others; and how pain becomes represented and intervened upon in a variety of domains might help American society make sense of what has happened over the past two decades. In sum, closer attention paid to the analysis and implications suggested in the chapters, along with the crucial recognition that every person’s pain matters, are key steps worth taking to end the current crisis.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference391 articles.

1. ABC News. (2017, October 30). The new face of heroin addiction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cskq_zGVSZs

2. Drug evaluation and the permissive principle: Continuities and contradictions between standards and practices in antidepressant regulation.;Social Studies of Science,2009

3. Are pain management questions in patient satisfaction surveys driving the opioid epidemic?;American Journal of Public Health,2016

4. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2004, June). Sentencing commission takes new look at mandatory minimums. Third Brand News. https://web.archive.org/web/20121011112132/http://www.uscourts.gov/News/TheThirdBranch/10-06-01/Sentencing_Commission_Takes_New_Look_at_Mandatory_Minimums.aspx

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3