Results of an exploratory survey within ESTS membership in 2022 on current trend of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and its training perspectives

Author:

Gandhi Shilpa1ORCID,Novoa Valentin Nuria Maria2,Brunelli Alessandro3ORCID,Schmitt-Opitz Isabelle4ORCID,Lugaresi Marialuisa5,Daddi Niccolò6,Decaluwe Herbert7,Batirel Hasan8ORCID,Veronesi Giulia9,Baste Jean-Marc10ORCID,Lyberis Paraskevas11,Dunning Joel12, ,Novoa Nuria Maria,Brunelli Alessandro,Opitz Isabelle,Daddi Niccolò,Decaluwe Herbert,Batirel Hasan,Veronesi Giulia,Baste Jean-Marc,Lyberis Paraskevas

Affiliation:

1. Cardiac surgery unit, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Georges’ University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK

2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital , Majadahonda, Spain

3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, St James’s University Hospital , Leeds, UK

4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Universitatsspital , Zurich, Switzerland

5. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna Medical School , Bologna, Italy

6. Division of Thoracic Surgery unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, University of Bologna Medical School , Bologna, Italy

7. Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Leuven , Leuven, Belgium

8. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Biruni University School of Medicine , Istanbul, Turkey

9. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Universita Vita e Salute San Raffaele , Milan, Italy

10. Cardiothoracic Department, Rouen University Hospital, Inserm U1096, UNIVRouen , Normandy, France

11. Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino , Torino, Italy

12. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital , Middlesbrough, UK

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly used in our specialty. We surveyed European Society of Thoracic Surgeons membership with the objective to determine current status of robotic thoracic surgery practice including training perspectives. METHODS A survey of 17 questions was rolled out with 1 surgeon per unit responses considered as acceptable. RESULTS A total of 174 responses were obtained; 56% (97) were board-certified thoracic surgeons; 28% (49) were unit heads. Most responses came from Italy (20); 22% (38) had no robot in their institutions, 31% (54) had limited access and only 17% (30) had full access including proctoring. Da Vinci Xi was the commonest system in 56% (96) centres, 25% (41) of them had dual console in all systems, whereas RATS simulator was available only in half (51.18% or 87). Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was the most commonly adopted surgical approach in 81% of centres (139), followed by thoracotomy in 67% (115) and RATS in 36% (62); 39% spent their training time on robotic simulator for training, 51% on robotic wet/dry lab, which being no significantly different to 46–59% who had training on VATS platform. There was indeed huge overlap between simulator models or varieties usage; 52% (90) reported of robotic surgery not a part of training curriculum with no plans to introduce it in future. Overall, 51.5% (89) responded of VATS experience being helpful in robotic training in view of familiarity with minimally invasive surgery anatomical views and dissection; 71% (124) reported that future thoracic surgeons should be proficient in both VATS and RATS. Half of the respondents found no difference in earlier chest drain removal with either approach (90), 35% (60) reported no difference in postoperative pain and 49% (84) found no difference in hospital stay; 52% (90) observed better lymph node harvest by RATS. CONCLUSIONS Survey concluded on a positive response with at least 71% (123) surgeons recommending to adopt robotics in future.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training in France: a nation-wide survey from young surgeons;Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery;2024-06-18

2. Aesculapius meets Vulcanus: robotic chest surgery;Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery;2024-03-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3