Affiliation:
1. Lehigh Valley Heart and Vascular Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network , 1250 S Cedar Crest Blvd #300, Allentown, PA 18103 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients with chronic stimulant-induced cardiomyopathy presenting with cardiogenic shock can be stabilized with conventional measures. However, their management post-stabilization has not been well described and poses unique challenges: (i) less chance of myocardial recovery compared to acute stimulant-induced cardiomyopathy, (ii) psychosocial barriers to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplantation, and (iii) concern for use of peripherally inserted central catheter for home inotrope in those with a history of substance abuse.
Case summary
Three patients with chronic stimulant-induced cardiomyopathy were admitted with cardiogenic shock progressing to Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions stage D or E. They were stabilized with inotrope and/or biventricular mechanical circulatory support. Long-term home inotrope was used as either a bridge to LVAD, reverse remodelling, or stabilization.
Discussion
Home inotrope should be viewed as an option in chronic stimulant-induced cardiomyopathy on a case-by-case basis. It can buy time to allow for myocardial stabilization or recovery through goal-directed medical therapy and stimulant cessation. It can also serve as a ‘psychosocial stress test’ for future consideration of advanced heart failure therapies.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)