Comparison of Tobacco Product Prices at Fort Liberty Army Installation and Surrounding Community Areas, 2021

Author:

Elliott Alison M12ORCID,Kong Amanda Y34ORCID,McGuirt Jared5,Prentice-Dunn Hannah6,Gougler-Reeves Krysta M6,Little Melissa A7,Ribisl Kurt M16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

2. Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research, University of California Fielding School of Public Health , Los Angeles, CA , USA

3. TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center , Oklahoma City, OK , USA

4. Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center , Oklahoma City, OK , USA

5. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Greensboro , Greensboro, NC , USA

6. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

7. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, VA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction High rates of tobacco use persist in the U.S. military, with 18.4% of service members smoking cigarettes in 2018. The Department of Defense’s (DoD) 2017 policy required that tobacco retailers on military installations set tobacco product prices equal to the most common community price, including tax, but there is limited evidence confirming whether local retailers are adhering to this policy. We examined tobacco product pricing in tobacco retailers on- and off-post at the largest U.S. Army installation, Fort Liberty, and Cumberland County, North Carolina. Aims and Methods Between June and August 2021, we collected data on tobacco product availability, price, and promotions from retailers on Fort Liberty (n = 14) and a random sample of off-post retailers within 10 miles of installation gates (n = 52). We calculated the mode, mean, and median price of each product, plus the difference in these prices at on- and off-post retailers. We used Welch’s t-test to test differences in mean prices between on- versus off-post retailers. Results The mode, mean, and median prices of cigarette packs and cartons were lower on-post than off-post (eg, $0.51–$0.55 cheaper for Marlboro cigarette packs on-post). However, the mode, mean, and median prices of smokeless tobacco products and little cigars were higher on-post than off-post (eg, $0.82–$0.89 more costly for Swisher Sweets 2-packs on-post). Conclusions Results highlight the need for continued enforcement to ensure compliance with the 2017 DoD policy. Comprehensive policy action to reduce tobacco price disparities on- and off-post is critical to reducing high rates of tobacco use among service members. Implications Despite the implementation of the 2017 DoD pricing policy, some tobacco products remain cheaper at tobacco retailers on-post compared to off-post retailers. Our results highlight the need for greater routine surveillance to increase implementation of the policy—particularly for cigarettes—to reduce high rates of tobacco use among service members.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health

Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3