Affiliation:
1. Cornell University , Ithaca, New York, United States
2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference40 articles.
1. Rigor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods;Allen,2017
2. Field courses narrow demographic achievement gaps in ecology and evolutionary biology;Beltran;Ecology and Evolution,2020
3. No progress on diversity in 40 years;Bernard;Nature Geoscience,2018
4. Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain;Boyle;Journal of Geography and Higher Education,2007
5. Biological fieldwork in Australian higher education: Is the cost worth the effort?;Burke Da;International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics,2014
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献