The Impact of Field Courses on Undergraduate Knowledge, Affect, Behavior, and Skills: A Scoping Review

Author:

Shinbrot Xoco A1ORCID,Treibergs Kira1ORCID,Hernández Lina M Arcila1,Esparza David1,Ghezzi-Kopel Kate1,Goebel Marc1,Graham Olivia J1,Heim Ashley B1ORCID,Smith Jansen A2,Smith Michelle K1

Affiliation:

1. Cornell University , Ithaca, New York, United States

2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Field courses provide transformative learning experiences that support success and improve persistence for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. But field courses have not increased proportionally with the number of students in the natural sciences. We conducted a scoping review to investigate the factors influencing undergraduate participation in and the outcomes from field courses in the United States. Our search yielded 61 articles, from which we classified the knowledge, affect, behavior, and skill-based outcomes resulting from field course participation. We found consistent reporting on course design but little reporting on demographics, which limits our understanding of who takes field courses. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to student participation, and knowledge gains were the most commonly reported outcome. This scoping review underscores the need for more rigorous and evidence-based investigations of student outcomes in field courses. Understanding how field courses support or hinder student engagement is necessary to make them more accessible to all students.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference40 articles.

1. Rigor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods;Allen,2017

2. Field courses narrow demographic achievement gaps in ecology and evolutionary biology;Beltran;Ecology and Evolution,2020

3. No progress on diversity in 40 years;Bernard;Nature Geoscience,2018

4. Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain;Boyle;Journal of Geography and Higher Education,2007

5. Biological fieldwork in Australian higher education: Is the cost worth the effort?;Burke Da;International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3