Is There an Ethical Upper Limit on Risks to Study Participants?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is There an Ethical Upper Limit on Risks to Study Participants?

Published:2020-07-01 Issue:2 Volume:13 Page:143-156
ISSN:1754-9973
Container-title:Public Health Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Eyal Nir¹

Affiliation:

1. Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University and Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health

Abstract

Abstract Are some risks to study participants too much, no matter how valuable the study is for society? This article answers in the negative.

Funder

NIAID

NSF

Open Philanthropy

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Link

http://academic.oup.com/phe/article-pdf/13/2/143/34590203/phaa028.pdf

Reference45 articles.

1. Why High-Risk, Non-Expected-Utility-Maximising Gambles Can Be Rational and Beneficial: The Case of HIV Cure Studies;Buchak;Journal of Medical Ethics,2017

2. Studies That Intentionally Infect People with Disease-Causing Bugs Are on the Rise;Cohen;Science,2016

3. SARS-CoV-2 Human Challenge Trials: Too Risky, Too Soon;Dawson;Journal of Infectious Diseases,2020

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Normative Power of Consent and Limits on Research Risks;Ethical Theory and Moral Practice;2024-05-22

2. Should Children Be Included in Human Challenge Studies?;Ethics & Human Research;2024-04-17

3. A trilemma for the lexical utility model of the precautionary principle;Philosophical Studies;2024-01-22

4. Students’ Challenges and Barriers in the Completion of an Undergraduate Thesis in the Case of A Premier Local College in the Philippines;International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences;2023-02-28

5. Risk Dilution: Or, How to Run a Minimal‐Risk HIV Challenge Trial;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2022-09-02