Author:
Banerjee Snehal,Breon-Drish Bradyn
Abstract
Abstract
We study how dynamic research affects information acquisition in financial markets. In our strategic trading model, the trader performs costly research to generate private information but does not always succeed. Optimal research activity responds to market conditions and generates novel implications. First, more frequent public disclosures can “crowd in” private information acquisition, increase price informativeness, and harm liquidity, instead of “leveling the playing field.” Second, observed research activity does not necessarily imply that traders are better informed. Finally, improvements in research effectiveness or higher market participation by uninformed investors can simultaneously increase price informativeness and liquidity.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference59 articles.
1. Uncovering hedge fund skill from the portfolio holdings they hide;Agarwal,;Journal of Finance,2013
2. Clear and liquid: The interaction of firm disclosure and trader competition;Avdis,,2019
3. Insider trading in continuous time;Back,;Review of Financial Studies,1992
4. Information in securities markets: Kyle meets Glosten and Milgrom;Back,;Econometrica,2004
5. Imperfect competition among informed traders;Back,;Journal of Finance,2000
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献