Policy-making and evaluation of gender equality programmes: Context, power, and resistance in the transformation process

Author:

Kalpazidou Schmidt Evanthia1ORCID,Palmén Rachel2,Bührer Susanne3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University , Bartholins Allé 7, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark

2. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya , Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, Castelldefels ES-08860, Spain

3. Fraunhofer ISI , Breslauer Str. 48, Karlsruhe DE-76139, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Through exploring the links between policy, evaluation, and gender, using a gender-transformative lens, this article sheds light on policy and evaluation processes of gender equality programmes, such as the political nature of evaluation and power configurations, involving resistance in the change process. Two case studies of gender equality programmes are visited to explore the links between gender policy implementation in specific contexts, and power configurations and resistance as key factors in both implementation and evaluation. We benefitted from the theoretical insights of both the feminist and the theory of change approaches, which helped us to bridge the boundaries between policy, gender scholarship, and evaluation and allowed us to reflect upon systemic factors and underlying mechanisms that are either facilitating or hindering transformation. This article highlights the benefits of applying such an evaluation framework and demonstrates why factoring in power and resistance to evaluations of gender equality programmes is necessary to explain successes or failures.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference92 articles.

1. Gendered Contradictions in Organizational Equity Projects;Ackers;Organization,2000

2. The Need for Reflexive Evaluation Approaches in Development Cooperation;Arkesteijn;Evaluation,2015

3. Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation;Astbury;American Journal of Evaluation,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3