Resolving syntactic–semantic conflicts: comprehension and processing patterns by deaf Chinese readers

Author:

Cheng Qi1,Yan Xu2,Yang Lujia3,Lin Hao45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistics, University of Washington , Seattle , United States

2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles , United States

3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Alberta , Edmonton , Canada

4. Institute of Linguistics, Shanghai International Studies University , Shanghai , China

5. China Braille and Sign Language Research and Application Center, Nanjing Normal University of Special Education , Nanjing , China

Abstract

Abstract The current study combined sentence plausibility judgment and self-paced reading tasks to examine the comprehension strategies and processing patterns of Chinese deaf individuals when comprehending written Chinese sentences with syntactic–semantic cue conflicts. Similar to findings from previous crosslinguistic studies on deaf readers, the Chinese deaf readers showed great variability in their comprehension strategies, with only 38% robustly relying on syntactic cues. Regardless of their overall comprehension preferences, the deaf readers all showed additional processing efforts as reflected by longer reading time at the verb regions when they relied on the syntactic cues. Those with less robust reliance on syntactic cues also showed longer reading time at the verb regions even when they relied on the semantic cues, suggesting sensitivity to the syntactic cues regardless of the comprehension strategy. These findings suggest that deaf readers in general endure more processing burden while resolving conflicting syntactic and semantic cues, likely due to their overall high reliance on semantic information during sentence comprehension. Increased processing burden thus may contribute to an overall tendency of over-reliance on semantic cues when comprehending sentences with cue conflicts.

Funder

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Shanghai Pujiang Programme

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference91 articles.

1. Resolving conflicts between syntax and plausibility in sentence comprehension;Andrews;Advances in Cognitive Psychology,2017

2. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal;Barr;Journal of Memory and Language,2013

3. Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study;Bates;Brain and Language,1987

4. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Bates;Journal of Statistical Software,2015

5. What eye movements reveal about deaf readers;Bélanger;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3