RE: Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities

Abstract

Abstract In a recent paper titled Expert range maps of global mammal distributions harmonised to three taxonomic authorities, Marsh et al. (2022) introduced a series of new geographic range maps for all extant species of mammals and made these maps available on the Map of Life (MoL) website (www.mol.org). The title of the paper and inclusion of over 140 prominent mammalogists and biogeographers as coauthors strongly suggested that these new range maps were carefully vetted. However, when examining the maps of Marsh et al. (2022) on the MoL web platform, we found a variety of serious problems, including, but not limited to: range exaggerations (inclusion of substantial geographic areas not represented by specimen records or verified observations); range maps that are geographically shifted so that species are shown as occurring in areas in which they do not, and not occurring in areas in which they do (and in some cases, these new maps do not even encompass the type locality of a species); range maps that simply omit peripheral populations of conservation concern; and range maps for fully marine mammals (i.e., those that do not spend any time on land) that include large swaths of both insular and continental landmasses. Overall, we evaluated the new “expert” mammal range maps on the MoL platform for 78 species (retrieved between 31 March 2022 and 1 April 2023) and show that there are serious, systemic problems with these maps, and that these problems are both geographically and taxonomically widespread. As such, we caution researchers to carefully review and evaluate the range maps of Marsh et al. (2022) on the MoL before using them for any research purpose—including conservation, biogeographical, and macroecological analyses of mammals.