The Nightmare Disorder Index: development and initial validation in a sample of nurses

Author:

Dietch Jessica R1ORCID,Taylor Daniel J2ORCID,Pruiksma Kristi3ORCID,Wardle-Pinkston Sophie2,Slavish Danica C4ORCID,Messman Brett4,Estevez Rosemary5,Ruggero Camilo J4,Kelly Kimberly4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

2. Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

4. Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX

5. Mental Health Flight, Maxwell Air Force Base, AL

Abstract

Abstract Study Objectives Nurses are a group at high risk for nightmares, yet little is known about the rate of nightmare disorder and associated psychosocial factors in this group in part attributable to the lack of a self-report questionnaire to assess DSM-5 criteria for nightmare disorder. Aims of the current study were to (1) report on development and initial validity of a self-report measure of DSM-5 nightmare disorder, and (2) examine the rate and associated factors of nightmare disorder among nurses. Methods Nurses (N = 460) completed baseline measures online including Nightmare Disorder Index (NDI), psychosocial and demographic questionnaires. A subset (n = 400) completed 14 days of sleep diaries and actigraphy. Results NDI demonstrated satisfactory psychometric characteristics as indicated by good internal consistency (α = 0.80), medium inter-item correlations (r = 0.50), medium to large item-total (r = 0.55–0.85) and convergent correlations (0.32–0.45), and small to medium discriminant correlations (–0.12–0.33). Per NDI, 48.7% of nurses reported no nightmares in the past month, 43.9% met partial/subthreshold criteria and 7.4% met full criteria for probable nightmare disorder. Nurses with nightmare disorder demonstrated significantly poorer psychosocial functioning (i.e. posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety, stress) than those with subthreshold nightmare symptoms, who had poorer functioning than those with no nightmares. Conclusions NDI is an efficient and valid self-report assessment of nightmare disorder. Nurses have high rates of nightmares and nightmare disorder which are associated with poorer psychosocial functioning. We recommend increased nightmare screening particularly for high-risk populations such as healthcare workers.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Neurology (clinical)

Reference59 articles.

1. International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-3);American Academy of Sleep Medicine.,2014

2. Nightmare frequency and nightmare topics in a representative German sample;Schredl;Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci.,2010

3. Prevalence of nightmare disorder in psychiatric outpatients;Swart;Psychother Psychosom.,2013

4. Nightmare complaints in treatment-seeking patients in clinical sleep medicine settings: diagnostic and treatment implications;Krakow;Sleep.,2006

5. The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well-being;Blagrove;J Sleep Res.,2004

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3