An assessment of a simple clinical technique to estimate pharyngeal collapsibility in people with obstructive sleep apnea

Author:

Osman Amal M123,Tong Benjamin K1ORCID,Landry Shane A34ORCID,Edwards Bradley A34ORCID,Joosten Simon A56,Hamilton Garun S56,Cori Jennifer M37,Jordan Amy S37ORCID,Stevens David23ORCID,Grunstein Ronald R38,McEvoy R Doug23,Catcheside Peter G23,Eckert Danny J123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health, A Flinders Centre of Research Excellence, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia

3. CRC for Alertness, Safety and Productivity, Melbourne, Australia

4. Sleep and Circadian Medicine Laboratory, Department of Physiology and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

5. Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Health Clayton, Victoria, Australia

6. School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

7. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

8. Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and the University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Study Objectives Quantification of upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could help inform targeted therapy decisions. However, current techniques are clinically impractical. The primary aim of this study was to assess if a simple, novel technique could be implemented as part of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study to assess pharyngeal collapsibility. Methods A total of 35 participants (15 female) with OSA (mean ± SD apnea–hypopnea index = 35 ± 19 events/h) were studied. Participants first completed a simple clinical intervention during a routine CPAP titration, where CPAP was transiently turned off from the therapeutic pressure for ≤5 breaths/efforts on ≥5 occasions during stable non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep for quantitative assessment of airflow responses (%peak inspiratory flow [PIF] from preceding 5 breaths). Participants then underwent an overnight physiology study to determine the pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) and repeat transient drops to zero CPAP to assess airflow response reproducibility. Results Mean PIF of breaths 3–5 during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention versus the physiology night were similar (34 ± 29% vs. 28 ± 30% on therapeutic CPAP, p = 0.2; range 0%–90% vs. 0%–95%). Pcrit was −1.0 ± 2.5 cmH2O (range −6 to 5 cmH2O). Mean PIF during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention and the physiology night correlated with Pcrit (r = −0.7 and −0.9, respectively, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated significant diagnostic utility for the simple intervention to predict Pcrit < −2 and < 0 cmH2O (AUC = 0.81 and 0.92), respectively. Conclusions A simple CPAP intervention can successfully discriminate between patients with and without mild to moderately collapsible pharyngeal airways. This scalable approach may help select individuals most likely to respond to non-CPAP therapies.

Funder

Cooperative Research Centre for Alertness, Safety and Productivity

Australian Research Council

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Clinical Neurology

Reference60 articles.

1. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults;Young;N Engl J Med.,1993

2. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery bypass grafting and obstructive sleep apnea;Dong;Int J Clin Exp Med.,2014

3. Obstructive sleep apnea and incident type 2 diabetes;Nagayoshi;Sleep Med.,2016

4. Neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-review;Bucks;Respirology.,2013

5. High prevalence of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea in the general population and methods for screening for representative controls;Simpson;Sleep Breath.,2013

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3