Gene expression dynamics are a proxy for selective pressures on alternatively polyadenylated isoforms

Author:

Levin Michal1,Zalts Harel2,Mostov Natalia2,Hashimshony Tamar2,Yanai Itai3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Quantitative Proteomics, Institute of Molecular Biology, Mainz 55128, Germany

2. Faculty of Biology, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel

3. Institute for Computational Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA

Abstract

Abstract Alternative polyadenylation (APA) produces isoforms with distinct 3′-ends, yet their functional differences remain largely unknown. Here, we introduce the APA-seq method to detect the expression levels of APA isoforms from 3′-end RNA-Seq data by exploiting both paired-end reads for gene isoform identification and quantification. We detected the expression levels of APA isoforms in individual Caenorhabditis elegans embryos at different stages throughout embryogenesis. Examining the correlation between the temporal profiles of isoforms led us to distinguish two classes of genes: those with highly correlated isoforms (HCI) and those with lowly correlated isoforms (LCI) across time. We hypothesized that variants with similar expression profiles may be the product of biological noise, while the LCI variants may be under tighter selection and consequently their distinct 3′ UTR isoforms are more likely to have functional consequences. Supporting this notion, we found that LCI genes have significantly more miRNA binding sites, more correlated expression profiles with those of their targeting miRNAs and a relative lack of correspondence between their transcription and protein abundances. Collectively, our results suggest that a lack of coherence among the regulation of 3′ UTR isoforms is a proxy for selective pressures acting upon APA usage and consequently for their functional relevance.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3