Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management

Author:

Thomassin-Naggara Isabelle12,Lamrabet Samia2,Crestani Adrien13,Bekhouche Asma12,Wahab Cendos Abdel12,Kermarrec Edith2,Touboul Cyril13,Daraï Emile13

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Université, IUC, 75005 Paris, France

2. Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France

3. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, GRC-6 (Clinical Research Group on Endometriosis) Sorbonne University, UMRS-938, 75020 Paris, France

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is an MRI classification of deep pelvic endometriosis (DE) able to correctly predict the risk of DE surgery. SUMMARY ANSWER A new radiological classification, that we have called the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) classification, is accurate and reproducible to assess the extension of the disease in central and lateral compartments and well correlated with operating time, hospital stay duration and the risk of voiding dysfunction. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Few imaging classifications are currently available to predict the extent of DE to help preoperative assessment of surgical outcomes and provide the patient with objective information about the risk of surgical complications. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted between 01 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 and included 150 women (mean age = 34.5 years, 20–52 years) with DE on MRI and who subsequently underwent surgery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Two radiologists independently graded the disease according to MRI-based Enzian classification (A (rectovaginal septum and vagina locations), B (uterosacral locations) and C (rectosigmoid locations)) and a new radiological classification, that we have called the dPEI, that grades the severity of DE as: mild, moderate or severe DE. MRI findings and classification were correlated with surgical and pathological results. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE MRI-based and surgical Enzian classifications were concordant for A lesions in 78.7% (118/150), for B lesions in 34.7% (52/150) and for C lesions in 82.7% (124/150). Operating time and hospital stays were longer in Group A2 (rectovaginal septum and vagina, 1–3 cm) compared to A0, B2 (uterosacral, 1–3 cm) compared to B0, C3 (rectosigmoid >3 cm) compared to C2 (rectosigmoid 1–3 cm) or C0 (P < 0.001), in severe compared to moderate DE patients, and in moderate compared to mild extensive patients (P < 0.01). Patients with vaginal or rectosigmoid involvement were respectively six and three times more likely to experience high-grade complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification than patients without vaginal or rectosigmoid disease (P < 0.001). Postoperative voiding dysfunction was correlated with A lesions (odds ratio (OR) = 6.82, 95% CI 2.34–20.5), moderate or severe DE (OR = 4.15, 95% CI 1.26–17.9), the presence of at least unilateral lateral pelvic involvement (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.14–11.2, P = 0.03) and C lesions (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.03–6.8, P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study was conducted in an expert center and needs to be validated in a multicenter study. There is a limited number of patients with lateral pelvic endometriosis beyond the parietal fascia, probably due to the low prevalence of this disease presentation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS MRI imaging can be used to accurately predict postoperative complications for women with DE. This may help the clinician to preoperatively inform a patient about the risks of surgery. Larger clinical studies are required to validate these results. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used for this study. I.T.N.: Remunerated lecture GE, Hologic, Guerbet, Canon; Advisory board: Siemens - These relationships are on the topic of breast imaging, not related to the topic of this paper. Other coauthors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.

Funder

Remunerated lecture GE, Hologic, Guerbet, Canon

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3