Predicting Success for Student Physical Therapists on the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Wolden Mitch1,Hill Brent2,Voorhees Sara3

Affiliation:

1. Physical Therapy Program, University of Jamestown, 4190 26th Ave South, Fargo, ND 58104 (USA)

2. School of Education, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota

3. Physical Therapy Program, University of Jamestown

Abstract

Abstract Background In physical therapist education, the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) is the predominant measure of student success. Because the NPTE is a high-stakes examination, predicting NPTE performance is important for physical therapist students and programs. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between first-attempt NPTE performance and physical therapist applicant variables and physical therapist student variables. The 4 identified physical therapist applicant variables were undergraduate cumulative grade point average (GPA), undergraduate GPA for prerequisite courses, Graduate Record Examination verbal and quantitative subscale scores, and admission scores. The 4 identified physical therapist student variables were first- and third-year physical therapist student GPA, clinical performance scores (first and final clinical experiences), noncognitive student variables, and comprehensive examination scores. Data Sources A systematic search was performed with the databases PubMed and EBSCO (1966–2018). Study Selection Studies included in the review met the following criteria: the physical therapist education program offered an entry-level master’s or doctorate degree, pertinent data were available for each independent variable, the relationship between the independent variable and the NPTE was investigated, the NPTE was a continuous variable, the program was a US entry-level therapist education program, and the study was peer reviewed. Data Extraction Two independent reviewers completed data extraction and quality appraisal using the McMaster Appraisal Tool. Data Synthesis Random-effects meta-analyses using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient as the measure of effect size was used. Limitations Limitations of the review included a lack of homogeneity, high NPTE pass rates, modifications to the McMaster Appraisal Tool, small sample sizes, and publication bias. Conclusions No one physical therapist applicant variable should be used as an independent predictor of first-attempt NPTE performance. For physical therapist students, first- and third-year physical therapist student GPA had a strong relationship with first-attempt NPTE performance; clinical performance had a weak and nonsignificant relationship with first-attempt NPTE performance.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3