Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene in schools: global overview on the WASH programme

Author:

Baltag V1

Affiliation:

1. Adolescent and Young Adult Health, WHO , Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract Context Safe drinking-water, sanitation and hygiene are crucial to human health and well-being. Safe WASH is not only a prerequisite to health, but contributes to livelihoods, school attendance and dignity and helps to create resilient communities living in healthy environments. WHO and UNICEF, through the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP), produce internationally comparable estimates of progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and are responsible for monitoring the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets related to WASH. Since the establishment of the SDGs, the JMP has published global baseline reports on WASH in households (2017), WASH in schools (2018) and WASH in health care facilities (2019), and a progress update on households (2019). Objectives To put the European findings in a global perspective regarding school toilets. Results Findings from the last report published under this JMP (2021) will be presented, updating national, regional and global estimates for WASH in schools up to the year 2019, with a special focus on the implications for ensuring the safety of students and school staff during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Using service ladders to benchmark and compare progress across countries on WASH in schools by tracking progress towards a basic level of service, as the indicator used for global monitoring of SDG targets related to WASH in schools, we will see that situations are contrasted. Globally 63% of schools had a basic sanitation service in 2019, while it is the case of 99% of schools in Europe and Northern America. The differences are of the same level regarding basic drinking water service in schools (respectively 69% vs. 99%), as well as for basic hygiene (resp. 57% vs. 98%). Conclusions Those results illustrate the paradox that existence of a given facility, access and use are not equivalent and need to be explored further.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3