Urban green infrastructure and pandemic response: how urban parks were used to support the COVID-19 response and the relationship between parkland acreage and excess mortality in large cities in the USA

Author:

Boyce Matthew R12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science & Security, , 3900 Reservoir Road NW, SE 306, Washington, DC 20057, USA

2. Salzburg Global Seminar Emerging Urban Leaders Program, , Schloss LeopoldskronLeopoldskronstrasse 56-58A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

Abstract

ABSTRACT The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was an unprecedented public health emergency, and relatively little research has investigated the relationship between urban green infrastructure, such as parks, and pandemic-related health outcomes. This study describes how urban parks were used to support the pandemic response and examines the associations between urban park acreage and excess mortality in 2020 in the 50 most populous cities in the USA. The descriptive portion of the study revealed that all cities temporarily closed at least some parks during the first year of the pandemic, and most reported collaborations between parks and public health authorities. Further, urban parks were used to support the pandemic response by serving as venues for meal distributions, diagnostic testing, education and childcare, housing shelters, vaccination clinics, personal protective equipment distributions and other services. A series of linear regression models were used to investigate the association between park acreage and excess mortality. Univariable regression revealed a negative, statistically significant relationship between total urban park acreage and excess mortality rates. However, the relationship weakened and was no longer significant when additional demographic and socioeconomic variables were added in multiple linear regressions. In combination, these results may inform efforts to optimize the design of urban parks and strengthen urban resilience against future infectious disease outbreaks, especially if they consider and address aspects such as park accessibility and equity.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3