Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current Measures, Findings, and Implications for Roadway Safety

Author:

Toups Robert1,Chirles Theresa J2,Ehsani Johnathon P2,Michael Jeffrey P2,Bernstein John P K3,Calamia Matthew4,Parsons Thomas D56,Carr David B7,Keller Jeffrey N1

Affiliation:

1. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

3. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4. Department of Clinical Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

5. Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

6. Computational Neuropsychology and Simulation Laboratory, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

7. Department of Medicine and Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Over 10,000 people a day turn 65 in the United States. For many older adults, driving represents an essential component of independence and is one of the most important factors in overall mobility. Recent survey studies in older adults suggest that up to 60% of older adult drivers with mild cognitive impairment, and up to 30% with dementia, continue to drive. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and detailed resource on the topics of cognition and driving for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers working on efforts related to older adult drivers. Research Design and Methods Publications on PubMed and Medline and discussions with experts working in geriatrics, technology, driving policy, psychology, and diverse aspects of driving performance were utilized to inform the current review. Results Research indicates that there is a complex and inverse correlation between multiple cognitive measures, driving performance, and risky driving behaviors. The fragmented nature of available peer-reviewed literature, and a reliance on correlative data, do not currently allow for the identification of the temporal and reciprocal nature of the interplay between cognition and driving endpoints. Discussion and Implications There are currently no widely accepted definitions, conceptual models, or uniform set of analyses for conducting geriatric research that is focused on driving. Establishing conventions for conducting research that harmonizes the fields of geriatrics, cognition, and driving research is critical for the development of the evidence base that will inform clinical practice and road safety policy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference114 articles.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3