Integrating biophysical crop growth models and whole genome prediction for their mutual benefit: a case study in wheat phenology

Author:

Jighly Abdulqader1ORCID,Weeks Anna2,Christy Brendan2,O’Leary Garry J34,Kant Surya35,Aggarwal Rajat6,Hessel David6,Forrest Kerrie L1,Technow Frank7ORCID,Tibbits Josquin F G1,Totir Radu6,Spangenberg German C15,Hayden Matthew J15,Munkvold Jesse6,Daetwyler Hans D15

Affiliation:

1. Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences , Bundoora, VIC 3083 , Australia

2. Agriculture Victoria, Rutherglen Centre , Rutherglen, VIC 3685 , Australia

3. Agriculture Victoria, Grains Innovation Park , Horsham, VIC 3400 , Australia

4. Centre for Agricultural Innovation, The University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia

5. School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University , Bundoora, VIC 3083 , Australia

6. Corteva Agriscience , Johnston, IA , USA

7. Corteva Agriscience , Tavistock, ON , Canada

Abstract

AbstractRunning crop growth models (CGM) coupled with whole genome prediction (WGP) as a CGM–WGP model introduces environmental information to WGP and genomic relatedness information to the genotype-specific parameters modelled through CGMs. Previous studies have primarily used CGM–WGP to infer prediction accuracy without exploring its potential to enhance CGM and WGP. Here, we implemented a heading and maturity date wheat phenology model within a CGM–WGP framework and compared it with CGM and WGP. The CGM–WGP resulted in more heritable genotype-specific parameters with more biologically realistic correlation structures between genotype-specific parameters and phenology traits compared with CGM-modelled genotype-specific parameters that reflected the correlation of measured phenotypes. Another advantage of CGM–WGP is the ability to infer accurate prediction with much smaller and less diverse reference data compared with that required for CGM. A genome-wide association analysis linked the genotype-specific parameters from the CGM–WGP model to nine significant phenology loci including Vrn-A1 and the three PPD1 genes, which were not detected for CGM-modelled genotype-specific parameters. Selection on genotype-specific parameters could be simpler than on observed phenotypes. For example, thermal time traits are theoretically more independent candidates, compared with the highly correlated heading and maturity dates, which could be used to achieve an environment-specific optimal flowering period. CGM–WGP combines the advantages of CGM and WGP to predict more accurate phenotypes for new genotypes under alternative or future environmental conditions.

Funder

Corteva Agriscience

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Plant Science,Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3