Integrating Motor Variability Evaluation Into Movement System Assessment

Abstract

Abstract   Common assessment tools for determining therapeutic success in rehabilitation typically focus on task–based outcomes. Task–based outcomes provide some understanding of the individual’s functional ability and motor recovery; however, these clinical outcomes may have limited translation to a patient’s functional ability in the real world. Limitations arise because (1) the focus on task–based outcome assessment often disregards the complexity of motor behavior, including motor variability, and (2) mobility in highly variable real-world environments requires movement adaptability that is made possible by motor variability. This Perspective argues that incorporating motor variability measures that reflect movement adaptability into routine clinical assessment would enable therapists to better evaluate progress toward optimal and safe real-world mobility. The challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating variability–based assessment of pathological movements are also discussed. This Perspective also indicates that the field of rehabilitation needs to leverage technology to advance the understanding of motor variability and its impact on an individual’s ability to optimize movement. Impact This Perspective contends that traditional therapeutic assessments do not adequately evaluate the ability of individuals to adapt their movements to the challenges faced when negotiating the dynamic environments encountered during daily life. Assessment of motor variability derived during movement execution can address this issue and provide better insight into a patient’s movement stability and maneuverability in the real world. Creating such a shift in motor system assessment would advance understanding of rehabilitative approaches to motor system recovery and intervention.