Ethics versus Ethical Codes

Author:

Van Alst Emily C.1,Pyburn K. Anne1

Affiliation:

1. Anthropology, Indiana University

Abstract

Abstract Ethical standards codified by major professional archaeological organizations mainly serve an educational purpose, given that sanctions are beyond the purview of most such bodies (but see below discussion of Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA). The three main problems with these codes are (1) People do not read them; (2) People do not understand them; and (3) Organizations do not update them. To be effective, codes of ethics must be regularly revisited and deliberately founded on a commitment to a defined “good” sensu Wylie’s 2003 interpretations of Kant. In the case of archaeology, that commitment must be to human rights as defined in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Although the ethical practice of archaeology falls under the requirements set out in several of the UN articles, this chapter will focus on Article 12.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference56 articles.

1. Indigenous Science for a World in Crisis.;Public Archaeology,2020

2. Culture, Resource, Management, and Anthropology: Pipelines and the Wakan at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.;Plains Anthropologist,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3