Assessing electronic health record phenotypes against gold-standard diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus

Author:

Spratt Susan E1,Pereira Katherine2,Granger Bradi B2,Batch Bryan C1,Phelan Matthew3,Pencina Michael34,Miranda Marie Lynn5,Boulware Ebony1,Lucas Joseph E6,Nelson Charlotte L3,Neely Benjamin3,Goldstein Benjamin A34,Barth Pamela7,Richesson Rachel L2,Riley Isaretta L1,Corsino Leonor1,McPeek Hinz Eugenia R1,Rusincovitch Shelley7,Green Jennifer1,Barton Anna Beth1,Kelley Carly,Hyland Kristen,Tang Monica,Elliott Amanda,Ruel Ewa,Clark Alexander,Mabrey Melanie,Morrissey Kay Lyn,Rao Jyothi,Hong Beatrice,Pierre-Louis Marjorie,Kelly Katherine,Jelesoff Nicole,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

2. Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA

3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA

4. Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA

5. Rice University and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

6. Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

7. Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of 8 electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotypes for diabetes mellitus against gold-standard American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria via chart review by clinical experts. Materials and Methods: We identified EHR-based diabetes phenotype definitions that were developed for various purposes by a variety of users, including academic medical centers, Medicare, the New York City Health Department, and pharmacy benefit managers. We applied these definitions to a sample of 173 503 patients with records in the Duke Health System Enterprise Data Warehouse and at least 1 visit over a 5-year period (2007–2011). Of these patients, 22 679 (13%) met the criteria of 1 or more of the selected diabetes phenotype definitions. A statistically balanced sample of these patients was selected for chart review by clinical experts to determine the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes in the sample. Results: The sensitivity (62–94%) and specificity (95–99%) of EHR-based type 2 diabetes phenotypes (compared with the gold standard ADA criteria via chart review) varied depending on the component criteria and timing of observations and measurements. Discussion and Conclusions: Researchers using EHR-based phenotype definitions should clearly specify the characteristics that comprise the definition, variations of ADA criteria, and how different phenotype definitions and components impact the patient populations retrieved and the intended application. Careful attention to phenotype definitions is critical if the promise of leveraging EHR data to improve individual and population health is to be fulfilled.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference30 articles.

1. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S in 2012.;American Diabetes Association;Diabetes Care.,2013

2. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group;N Engl J Med.,1993

3. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2014

4. A comparison of phenotype definitions for diabetes mellitus;Richesson;J Am Med Inform Assoc.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3