Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review

Author:

McBrien Kerry A12,Souri Sepideh2,Symonds Nicola E3,Rouhi Azin4,Lethebe Brendan C2,Williamson Tyler S2,Garies Stephanie12,Birtwhistle Richard5,Quan Hude2,Fabreau Gabriel E26,Ronksley Paul E2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

3. Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

4. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

5. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

6. Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Data derived from primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) are being used for research and surveillance. Case definitions are required to identify patients with specific conditions in EMR data with a degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study is to identify and provide a summary of case definitions that have been validated in primary care EMR data. Materials and Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase (from inception to June 2016) to identify studies that describe case definitions for clinical conditions in EMR data and report on the performance metrics of these definitions. Results We identified 40 studies reporting on case definitions for 47 unique clinical conditions. The studies used combinations of International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD-9) codes, Read codes, laboratory values, and medications in their algorithms. The most common validation metric reported was positive predictive value, with inconsistent reporting of sensitivity and specificity. Discussion This review describes validated case definitions derived in primary care EMR data, which can be used to understand disease patterns and prevalence among primary care populations. Limitations include incomplete reporting of performance metrics and uncertainty regarding performance of case definitions across different EMR databases and countries. Conclusion Our review found a significant number of validated case definitions with good performance for use in primary care EMR data. These could be applied to other EMR databases in similar contexts and may enable better disease surveillance when using clinical EMR data. Consistent reporting across validation studies using EMR data would facilitate comparison across studies. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016040020 (submitted June 8, 2016, and last revised June 14, 2016)

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3