Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange

Author:

Apathy Nate C123ORCID,Vest Joshua R34ORCID,Adler-Milstein Julia5,Blackburn Justin4,Dixon Brian E34ORCID,Harle Christopher A36

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

2. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

3. Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

4. Health Policy & Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

5. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

6. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To assess the practice- and market-level factors associated with the amount of provider health information exchange (HIE) use. Materials and Methods Provider and practice-level data was drawn from the Meaningful Use Stage 2 Public Use Files from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Physician Compare National Downloadable File, and the Compendium of US Health Systems, among other sources. We analyzed the relationship between provider HIE use and practice and market factors using multivariable linear regression and compared primary care providers (PCPs) to non-PCPs. Provider volume of HIE use is measured as the percentage of referrals sent with electronic summaries of care (eSCR) reported by eligible providers attesting to the Meaningful Use electronic health record (EHR) incentive program in 2016. Results Providers used HIE in 49% of referrals; PCPs used HIE in fewer referrals (43%) than non-PCPs (57%). Provider use of products from EHR vendors was negatively related to HIE use, while use of Athenahealth and Greenway Health products were positively related to HIE use. Providers treating, on average, older patients and greater proportions of patients with diabetes used HIE for more referrals. Health system membership, market concentration, and state HIE consent policy were unrelated to provider HIE use. Discussion HIE use during referrals is low among office-based providers with the capability for exchange, especially PCPs. Practice-level factors were more commonly associated with greater levels of HIE use than market-level factors. Conclusion This furthers the understanding that market forces, like competition, may be related to HIE adoption decisions but are less important for use once adoption has occurred.

Funder

National Library of Medicine

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference48 articles.

1. Practice strategies to improve primary care for chronic disease patients under a pay-for-value program;Cross;Healthc (Amst),2019

2. Alternative payment models and hospital engagement in health information exchange;Lin;Am J Manag Care,2019

3. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability;Walker;Health Aff,2005

4. Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies;Vest;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2010

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3